Bank of Italy: Stablecoins No Cheaper for Remittances
A Bank of Italy study finds stablecoin remittances lack consistent cost or speed advantages over traditional services, as fiat on-ramp fees dominate. Across 200 test transfers, stablecoins were cheaper in most corridors but not systematically so, highlighting the need for better payment rails and regulatory clarity.
Quick Take
Bank of Italy tested 200 USDC remittances across 10 corridors, costs ranged 0.3%–9%.
Stablecoins were cheaper than traditional services in most corridors, but not systematically.
Fiat on/off-ramp fees and currency conversion dominate costs, not blockchain fees.
Study urges investment in instant payment infrastructure to boost stablecoin viability.
Market Impact Analysis
NeutralThe study's findings challenge the narrative of stablecoins as inherently cheaper for remittances, potentially reducing speculative interest in payment-focused stablecoins, but also highlight areas for improvement that could boost long-term adoption.
Speculation Analysis
Key Takeaways
- Stablecoin remittances are not systematically cheaper or faster than traditional rails, with costs swinging from 0.3% to 9% across corridors.
- Fiat onramp and currency conversion fees, not blockchain costs, drive the bulk of stablecoin transfer expenses.
- Instant payment infrastructure at both ends is key to unlocking stablecoin speed advantages, the study found.
- Regulatory design significantly impacts efficiency; prohibitionist regimes push users to unregulated channels, increasing complexity.
What Happened
The Bank of Italy examined whether stablecoins deliver cheaper, faster remittances by running 200 USDC transfers between Italy and five countries. Researchers compared end-to-end costs and settlement times against traditional money transfer operators. The result: no systematic advantage. In some corridors, stablecoins undercut conventional services, but in others, they were pricier. Speed hinged entirely on local payment rails. Where instant payment systems existed, settlement took under 20 minutes; elsewhere, it stretched to two business days. The findings, published just as the EU’s MiCA framework takes effect, challenge the narrative that stablecoins inherently slash remittance costs.
The Numbers
Total fees swung from 0.3% to nearly 9% of the transfer amount, with the World Bank’s global remittance average of 6.65% as a benchmark. In most of the ten corridors tested, stablecoins did prove cheaper, but not universally. Against Wise—a leading fintech—stablecoins won on price in only three of seven comparable corridors. Blockchain transaction fees were a rounding error; the bulk of costs came from exchange spread and currency conversion. The $307 billion stablecoin market’s promise of frictionless value transfer remains unrealized without better fiat on- and off-ramp infrastructure.
Why It Happened
Stablecoin remittances fail to deliver because fiat gateways dominate the cost equation. When a sender buys USDC with euros and a receiver cashes out to pesos, forex markups and platform fees add up. The blockchain part is cheap, but the endpoints aren’t. Regulatory design further complicates efficiency. Prohibitionist policies don’t stop usage; they drive it underground, adding layers of risk and complexity. The study’s authors argue that the real game-changer is direct real-economy spending—if recipients could pay rent or buy groceries with USDC, bypassing off-ramps entirely, the cost advantage would become clear.
Broader Impact
For the crypto industry, the findings are a reality check. Stablecoin adoption for remittances isn’t doomed, but it’s far from plug-and-play. The study lends weight to calls for investment in instant payment infrastructure as a precursor to stablecoin viability. Policymakers crafting frameworks like MiCA and the US GENIUS Act should note that regulatory clarity reduces friction; ambiguity pushes users toward riskier channels. As the market eyes stablecoins for real-world utility, the report underscores that the path to mainstream remittances runs through better fiat rails, not just blockchain innovation.
What to Watch Next
- Monitor how MiCA and GENIUS Act implementation affects stablecoin on/off-ramp availability in key remittance corridors.
- Watch for infrastructure upgrades in emerging markets—instant payment systems are the critical variable.
- Track pilot projects enabling direct stablecoin spending without fiat conversion, as this would reshape the cost equation.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Always late to trends?
Join for the latest news, insights & more.
Disclaimer: Bytewit is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data.
© 2026 Bytewit. All Rights Reserved. This article is for informational purposes only.
