BIP-110 Mandatory Signaling Begins with Only 2.5% Miner Support
Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 entered mandatory signaling with miner support at just 2.53%, far below the 55% threshold. A minority BIP-110 chain emerged but fell behind, making a sustained split unlikely. The milestone tests feasibility of contentious consensus changes without majority miner backing.
Quick Take
BIP-110 started mandatory signaling at block 961,632 with only 2.53% miner support.
A minority chain enforcing the rules quickly fell behind the dominant chain.
The proposal aims to limit inscriptions and data, but critics warn of division.
Without more miner support, the BIP-110 branch could stall entirely.
Market Impact Analysis
NeutralThe BIP-110 proposal has minimal miner support, making a sustained chain split unlikely, thus limited market impact; however, the contentious debate may cause short-term uncertainty.
Speculation Analysis
Key Takeaways
- BIP-110’s mandatory signaling phase began with only 2.53% miner support, triggering a minority chain that quickly fell behind.
- The proposal aims to limit inscriptions and non-monetary data, but critics warn it could fracture Bitcoin’s consensus.
- Without significantly more miner backing, the rival chain is likely to stall, ending the contentious upgrade attempt.
- The milestone tests whether a consensus change can advance without broad miner support, escalating the block space debate.
What Happened
On Saturday, Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 entered its mandatory-signaling phase at block 961,632. Support from miners clocked in at just 2.53% — a mere 51 out of the previous 2,016 blocks. Nodes enforcing the new rules immediately began rejecting non-signaling blocks, creating a minority chain. That branch rapidly lagged behind the dominant network, where miners continued building on the consensus chain. The low participation makes a sustained split improbable.
The Numbers
Only 51 blocks signaled support, representing 2.53% of the prior 2,016-block window. The early activation threshold stands at 55%, a level BIP-110 is far from reaching. The mandatory signaling period runs from block 961,632 to 963,647. If by some miracle it locked in by block 963,648, restrictions would activate at block 965,664. Proposed limits include capping output scripts at 34 bytes and OP_RETURN at 83 bytes.
Why It Happened
BIP-110, authored by pseudonymous developer Dathon Ohm, aims to temporarily curb inscriptions and other non-monetary data. Supporters argue such data burdens node operators with higher storage and bandwidth costs. However, prominent figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back oppose the measure, warning it could split the network. The paltry miner signaling reflects broad skepticism about imposing such restrictions on Bitcoin’s existing rules.
Broader Impact
This episode tests the viability of contentious consensus changes without majority miner backing. A failed BIP-110 could set a precedent that such upgrades require overwhelming support. Yet the discussion also reignites the debate over Bitcoin’s block space usage and governance, a tension unlikely to disappear. If the minority branch fizzles, proponents may explore alternative paths, including a proof-of-work fork.
What to Watch Next
- Miner signaling rates through block 963,648 — any sudden uptick could signal a shift, though highly unlikely.
- Developments around a potential proof-of-work change fallback, with code already rebased as a contingency.
- Whether the Bitcoin community formalizes a clearer process for handling contentious proposals to avoid future rifts.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Always late to trends?
Join for the latest news, insights & more.
Disclaimer: Bytewit is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data.
© 2026 Bytewit. All Rights Reserved. This article is for informational purposes only.
