Crypto-Backed Candidate Defeats Stripe Millionaire in Calif. Race
Stripe founder Saikat Chakrabarti, a progressive who criticized 'crypto billionaires,' lost his House bid to Scott Wiener, backed by Ripple's Chris Larsen. The race highlights crypto's growing political muscle, with pro-crypto PACs spending heavily to influence primaries.
Quick Take
Chakrabarti spends nearly $10M but gets only 15% of votes.
Ripple's Larsen funds PAC opposing Chakrabarti and supports Wiener directly.
Crypto industry's political influence grows, with Fairshake PAC claiming multiple primary wins.
Market Impact Analysis
BullishCrypto-backed candidate's victory in a primary suggests growing political influence, potentially leading to more favorable regulations in the long term.
Speculation Analysis
Key Takeaways
- Crypto-funded PAC helps oust self-funded progressive from California congressional race.
- Saikat Chakrabarti spent $10M, got just 15% of the vote against Scott Wiener.
- Ripple's Chris Larsen gave $100K to anti-Chakrabarti PAC and $7K directly to Wiener.
- Wiener's win underscores crypto's growing influence in reshaping Democratic primaries.
- Runoff with Connie Chan will test whether crypto backing translates to general election momentum.
What Happened
Saikat Chakrabarti, a former Stripe founding engineer and self-described progressive, lost his bid to replace Nancy Pelosi in California’s 11th District. The Democrat poured $10 million into his campaign but captured only 15% of the vote. His opponent, Scott Wiener, advanced to a runoff alongside Connie Chan, backed significantly by Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen. Larsen’s financial support—direct and via a PAC—helped derail Chakrabarti’s anti-crypto platform.
The Numbers
Chakrabarti’s $10 million war chest proved no match for targeted crypto spending. Larsen contributed $100,000 to the Abundant Future PAC, which spent $65,200 opposing Chakrabarti through ads. Larsen also gave $7,000 directly to Wiener’s campaign. The result: Chakrabarti mustered just 15% of the ballots counted so far. The crypto industry’s political machine, including the Fairshake super PAC, has claimed victories in six other Democratic primaries this cycle with over $20 million in backing.
Why It Happened
Chakrabarti ran as an antagonist to “crypto billionaires” and tech oligarchs, advocating for progressive policies and a ban on congressional stock trading. This placed him in the crosshairs of the crypto lobby, which has aggressively funded moderate Democrats. Larsen’s donations reflect a broader industry strategy to support candidates perceived as friendlier to digital assets. With Ripple’s ongoing legal battles and the sector’s push for regulatory clarity, neutralizing anti-crypto voices has become a political priority.
Broader Impact
The outcome extends beyond a single district. Crypto’s ability to unseat a self-funded candidate signals its growing electoral muscle. If Wiener wins the runoff, expect heightened lobbying on stablecoin legislation and exchange oversight. The industry’s bipartisan spending spree—from Democratic primaries to Trump’s inauguration—shows no signs of slowing.
What to Watch Next
- The Wiener-Chan runoff: will crypto money continue to play a decisive role?
- Fairshake PAC’s next targets: the super PAC is eyeing additional primaries to cement pro-crypto majorities.
- Ripple’s policy agenda: Larsen’s political investments may accelerate progress on the SEC lawsuit and stablecoin bills.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Always late to trends?
Join for the latest news, insights & more.
Disclaimer: Bytewit is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data.
© 2026 Bytewit. All Rights Reserved. This article is for informational purposes only.
